From the HSUS:
<< Federal Appeals Court Declares Horse Slaughter in Texas Illegal
Two of the Nation’s Three Horse Slaughter Plants Face Closure, 
Criminal Charges FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
WASHINGTON (Jan. 20, 2007) – The Humane Society of the United States, 
which has been campaigning to ban the slaughter of American horses 
for export for human consumption, hailed a decision yesterday by the 
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit overturning a 
lower court decision that invalidated a Texas state law banning the 
sale of horsemeat for human consumption.  The HSUS filed an amicus 
brief in the case in March 2006, arguing in defense of Texas’ state 
law barring the slaughter of American horses for human consumption 
overseas.
"This is the most important court action ever on the issue of horse 
slaughter. A federal appeals court has ruled that America’s horses 
can no longer be slaughtered in Texas and shipped to foreign 
countries for food,” said Wayne Pacelle, president and CEO for The 
Humane Society of the United States. “When this ruling is enforced, a 
single plant in Illinois will stand alone in conducting this grisly 
business.”  
The criminal code of Texas has long prohibited the sale or possession 
of horse meat, but the law has never been enforced.  In 2002, 
responding to citizen and local government concerns about the two 
foreign-owned horse slaughter plants in the state – Dallas Crown in 
Kaufman and Beltex in Fort Worth – then-Texas Attorney General John 
Cornyn issued a written opinion that the 1949 Texas law applies and 
may be enforced.
In response, the Tarrant County District Attorney attempted to 
enforce the law, but last year a federal district court in Texas 
ruled that the law was repealed by another statute and preempted by 
federal law.  The District Attorney appealed that decision last year, 
and was supported by The HSUS in briefing before the Court of Appeals.
In its decision, the court flatly rejected the slaughterhouses’ 
arguments that the ban on the sale of horsemeat does not protect 
horses from theft and abuse, and that regulating horse slaughter can 
achieve those same purposes, noting instead that “it is a matter of 
commonsense that...alternatives...do not preserve horses as well as 
completely prohibiting the sale and transfer of horsemeat for human 
consumption.”  The court noted that the horse on the Texas trail is a 
cinematic icon, but “not once in memory did the cowboy eat his horse.”
The Court of Appeals also quickly brushed aside the slaughter plants’ 
arguments that the Texas law at issue was invalid under state and 
federal law, noting that the Texas law “has not been repealed or 
preempted by federal law,” and that “several states have already 
banned its commercial use for human consumption.” 
“The Texas law prohibiting the sale of horse meat for human food 
could hardly be any more explicit," said Jonathan Lovvorn, vice 
president of animal protection litigation for The HSUS. "The court’s 
decision means that any individual employee or corporation involved 
in the horse slaughter business in Texas now stares straight ahead at 
criminal prosecution."
According to the U.S. Department of Agriculture, 100,800 American 
horses were slaughtered in three foreign-owned slaughter houses in 
2006.  Opponents of the slaughter ban argue the practice constitutes 
a humane way to kill old animals, but investigations by The HSUS show 
cruelty and abuse throughout the process. USDA statistics show that 
more than 92 percent of horses slaughtered in the U.S. are not old 
and infirm but in good condition.
Legislation to ban the slaughter of American horses nationwide was 
introduced this week in the 110th Congress, and this court ruling 
will give further momentum to the federal legislative effort.  In the 
U.S. Senate, the American Horse Slaughter Prevention Act, S. 311, was 
launched Jan. 17 by Sens. Mary Landrieu (D-La.) and John Ensign (R-
Nev.), with 12 original cosponsors.  In the U.S. House, Reps. Janice 
Schakowsky (D-Ill.) Ed Whitfield (R-Ky.), John Spratt (D-S.C.), and 
Nick Rahall (D-W.V.) introduced a companion bill, H.R. 503, the same 
day with 62 original cosponsors. 
The measure received tremendous bipartisan support in the 109th 
Congress, winning a vote of 263 to 146 in the House. It stalled in 
the Senate in late 2006, however, and was not brought up for a vote 
before Congress adjourned, even though a similar effort had been 
overwhelmingly approved by the Senate in 2005.
Media Contact: Polly Shannon, 703 283 5104, pshannon @ hsus.org
==================
[Moderator--while this is a step in the right direction, it is still 
not going to stop horse slaughter.  When I was at Cavel Int. in 
DeKalb, IL, and the man we talked to said that a lot of the 
byproducts were sold for chicken feed, I assume within the USA.  This 
loophole needs to be closed next.]
Post: 
naturalhorsetrim@yahoogroups.com